This was posted on the NSDC Website- felt you might find it s interesting as I do.

The Department of Education has outlined
initial guidelines for three components of American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (ARRA) funding: the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund, Title I, and the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). You can find detailed
information about the guidelines and the distribution of funds through
www.ed.gov.


In addition to distributing monies quickly
to avert layoffs and stimulate job creation, a key principle that will guide
the use of ARRA funds is improving student achievement through school
improvement and reform
. The Department is emphasizing improvements in teacher
effectiveness and equitable distribution of qualified teachers as well as
providing support for the nation's lowest performing schools. Specifically, the
legislation identifies developing teacher leaders as coaches and instructional
leaders as one possible strategy.
Therefore, these funds have the potential to
significantly impact the reach and quality of professional learning for all
educators. Given the time constraints surrounding this legislation, the funds
must be used on one-time investments vs. programs with ongoing commitments. Most
importantly, these funds must be applied in ways that demonstrate to the
investors –the public — a significant improvement in teaching and learning in
schools.

In consideration of these parameters, NSDC
has outlined some strategies that we believe have potential to meet these
expectations:

  • Prepare more instructional coaches by
    developing the knowledge and skills necessary to support improved educator
    practice and student learning.
  • Prepare more teacher leaders to advance the
    NSDC definition of professional development.
  • Contract with one or more external
    consultants to provide one-on-one technical assistance to principals to create
    new master schedules that enable collaborative teacher teams to engage in
    professional learning two or more times each week.

  • Identify and support demonstration sites to
    serve as models of excellence in implementing effective professional learning.
  • Provide two-years of intensive coaching and
    instructional leadership support for principals in low-performing schools.

  • Provide two-years of intensive technical
    assistance and support for leadership teams in low-performing schools.

  • Conduct a Professional Learning Audit;
    organize a local task force to critically review and assess the purpose, form,
    and results from professional development in the school district. Similarly,
    administer and use the results of NSDC's Standards Assessment Inventory.

  • Organize, facilitate, and support volunteer
    teams of teachers who want to pilot the continuous cycle of improvement
    described in NSDC's definition of professional development. Contract with one
    or more external consultants or institutions of higher education to document
    and assess each team's experience.

Special Edition of TQ Research and Policy Update
http://www.tqsource.org/publications/specialEditionMarch2009Update.pdf

Excerpt from this edition-

Providing Quality Professional Development and Career Options
Professional Development
Although there are many professional development opportunities made available for educators, the question remains whether these opportunities are targeted to improve teacher effectiveness. Targeted professional development requires the creation and implementation of a quality teacher evaluation system, as discussed below. The remaining challenge in professional development is to determine what opportunities states should offer and require. If a quality evaluation system is in place, information should be available to guide the offerings based on areas of challenge within the teaching community—either areas of individual challenge or topics from which a larger teaching population can benefit.
Examples of professional development focused on individual challenges include the following:
•Training and support to strengthen content knowledge
•Training in pedagogical techniques

Examples of professional development beneficial to a larger teaching population include the following:
•Research or technological advances or brain research advances that could affect teaching and learning
•Information or training specific to the context in which educators are functioning—large populations of English language learners or schools with a large population of culture/ethnic diversity.
Consistent findings enumerate the characteristics of quality professional development. When analyzing their professional development offerings, states should ensure that they embody these characteristics:
•Intensive and ongoing
•Job embedded
•Job relevant
•Linked to school vision and mission

Career Options
Too often career options for teachers mean that advancement in their careers takes them out of the classroom. School districts and states should implement career opportunities that provide roles and opportunities for expert teachers that allow them to share their experience, knowledge, and skills to benefit the school and classrooms.

These types of roles could include the following:
•Creating teacher leadership opportunities in which teachers have a voice in policy and practice
•Utilizing excellent teachers as mentors

Creating Learning Communities
Numerous content- and pedagogy-related professional development offerings already exist in states. Increasingly, however, the creation of learning communities or communities of practice is identified as a positive professional development experience for teachers. States should work to analyze the policies and requirements in place for professional development and the processes by which they determine what professional development to offer and whether it has the characteristics listed above. In addition, states should consider whether they are too narrowly defining professional development in a manner that precludes the creation and support of learning communities and other collaborative learning opportunities for teachers.

Powerful Learning Practice Meets the Mark

The work Will and I are doing through Powerful Learning Practice meets most of these requirements. If you are looking for a strategic way to spend your PD dollars this may be a way to do that not only meets the NSDC's criteria for best practice but is grounded in Teacher Quality research and results in transformational change.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “NSDC and TQ Research Outlines Strategies for Spending your Stimulus Dollars”

  1. Ellen Weber April 3, 2009 at 8:12 am #

    Sheryl, there are great ideas here for transformational change. There is so much to be done and so few who carry the torch as you do here:-) Great blog and thanks – I will blogroll it with delight!

  2. Dr. Smriti Singh April 16, 2009 at 7:38 am #

    Hi, thanks for your ideas on innovative learning / teaching techniques of the 21st century. Just few words of excitement. I strongly believe the only way to teach anyone in this information overflow / clutter is through their passion. The calssic example is the super success of the Espoir programs based on “Passion based learning”. For example, take Smarten Your English through Cricket”. You know Asians are crazy about cricket. Which other medium is more suitable to teach English other than their own passionate sport? Other product I have gone through is “Sharpen Your English through Love & Romance”. Who is not passionate about Love & Romance? Neither these products are jokes nor they are developed by some fly by night operators. Each of these products explain English from school level to GRE / GMAT / IELTS level! I think these are the best approach because it seduces you to learn!